Darwin held that natural selection operates at the level of the individual.
If an individual does become infected, then the model generates the time at which the individual is first infected, the time at which symptoms first appear and the time at which the individual either dies or recovers.
According to US federal rules: “If an individual declares that such individual is a registered voter in the jurisdiction in which the individual desires to vote and that the individual is eligible to vote in an election for Federal office, but the name of the individual does not appear on the official list of eligible voters for the polling place or an election official asserts that the individual is not eligible to vote, such individual shall be permitted to cast a provisional ballot…”
The recognition that is due to each individual can be accorded to that individual by respecting his fundamental rights.
Gender, understood in this way, is a function that organizes all the parts of a social individual into the social individual it is.
If some predicate “F” applies to an individual, then the individual has to exist (for if it were otherwise, how could the predicate apply to it?).
“John could not have been a millionaire” asserts that in any world in which an individual identical with John exists that individual is not a millionaire.
Very briefly, the problem can be stated as follows: it seems that in order to deny the existence of a given individual, one must assume the existence of that very individual.
Moreover, the individual agents constitute a new entity, a supra-individual entity not reducible to the individual agents and the relations among them (Epstein 2015).
The social individual is distinct from the human organism and the person because the social individual stands in social relations essentially, but human organisms and persons do so only accidentally.
Just as the life of a biological species only appears in the generation and destruction of individual organisms, so the life of Spirit involves the generation and destruction of these individual persons.
Raz has pointed out that individual rights frequently presuppose the existence of general social goods and that individual rights themselves frequently promote social goods (1986, 193–216, 245–263; 1995).
It could be argued, for example, that the development of communal law, with its strong Roman influence, enhanced individual property rights or that participatory government promoted a consciousness of individual value.
It is the actual pattern of dealings the producers have had with an individual—identified from time to time by the exercise of their recognitional capacities in regard to that individual—which ties the name to the individual.
Statements such as ‘Individual 1 prefers alternative x more than Individual 2 prefers alternative y’ or ‘Individual l prefers a switch from x to y more than Individual 2 prefers a switch from x* to y*’ are considered meaningless.
Gilson wrote that “every human person is first an individual, but he is much more than an individual, since one only speaks of a person, as of a personage, when the individual substance under consideration possesses in his own right a certain dignity.”
In all of these and related versions of the Individual Ownership Thesis, the basic claim is that each individual has a mind of his or her own, and has a sort of intentional autonomy that is incompatible with the view that individual minds are somehow fused when intentional states are shared.
When…we consider an individual worthy of blame or of praise, we are not merely judging the moral quality of the event with which the individual is so intimately associated; we are judging the moral quality of the individual herself in some more focused, noninstrumental, and seemingly more serious way. (1990: 41)
Combinatorial: Similar levels in the two in the two individual stresses but a different response to combined stresses; cancelled: transcript response to either or both individual stresses individual stresses returned to control levels; prioritized: opposing responses to the individual stresses and one stress response prioritized in stress combination; independent: response to only one single stress and a similar response to combined stresses; similar: similar response to combined stresses; similar: similar responses to both individual stresses and to combined stresses.
- being or characteristic of a single thing or person
Example: individual drops of rain
- a human being; person, singular, assertive existential pronoun; pronoun, person, singular; quantifier: assertive existential
- separate and distinct from others of the same kind
Example: mark the individual pages
- a single organism
- characteristic of or meant for a single person or thing
Example: an individual serving
- concerning one person exclusively
Example: we all have individual cars
On this page, there are 20 sentence examples for individual. They are all from high-quality sources and constantly processed by lengusa's machine learning routines.
Just use the " " button to fragment sentence examples and start your learning flow.
Example output from one of your searches:
Combinatorial Similar levels in the two in the two individual stresses but a different response to combined stresses cancelled transcript response to either or both individual stresses individual stresses returned to control levels prioritized opposing responses to the individual stresses and one stress response prioritized in stress combination independent response to only one single stress and a similar response to combined stresses similar similar response to combined stresses similar similar responses to both individual stresses and to combined stresses